|
Copyright
Law Enforcement Provokes Protests
By Sarah Lai Stirland
NEW YORK, Nov. 23 (UPI) — Hundreds of civil libertarians, programmers,
engineers and online activists enraged over the latest dramatic enforcement
of a strict digital-era copyright law demonstrated in cities across the
United States Monday, as civil liberties group the Electronic Frontier
Foundation sat behind closed doors negotiating the first steps of the
release of a Russian programmer arrested for violating the law.
In cities all over the United States around noon, protestors walked around
with "Free Dmitry" signs and handed out flyers explaining the complex
free speech and fair use issues related to the DMCA. Protests took place
in front of software maker Adobe Systems' offices and in other heavily
trafficked public spaces in New York City, Reno, Nevada, Seattle, Wa.,
Austin, Tx, San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Jose Ca., and Boston, Mass.
The biggest and most vociferous rally appeared to be in front of Adobe's
headquarters in San Jose, where hundreds of protesters chanted: "Set Dmitry
free today, hey, hey, ho ho. The DMCA has got to go." In Washington DC,
a small rally of 10 people gathered in front of FBI headquarters.
The protest was sparked off by the arrest of Dmitry Sklyarov, a Russian
computer security systems expert in Las Vegas last Monday. The US attorney's
office for the Northern District of California has charged him with trafficking
in software that allows readers to copy electronic books. The FBI arrested
Sklyarov after he gave a speech at Defcon-9, an Internet security conference
in Las Vegas, about his company Elcomsoft's product, the Advanced eBook
Processor. Elcomsoft's product unlocks software maker Adobe Systems' copyright
protection system on its eBook Reader product. The Digital Millenium Copyright
Act criminalizes the act of breaking through any technological security
system that has been implemented to protect intellectual property. Violators
face up to five years in jail or fines of up to $500,000.
This arrest is among the first cases of criminal enforcement of the DMCA,
which is a broad law that seeks to give intellectual property owners more
control in an age when information threatens to run out of control because
of the ease with which digital information can be electronically copied
and redistributed through the Internet without compensating the original
copyright owners.
Sklyarov's arrest highlights the increasingly acrimonious battle over
how copyrights should be defined as information, entertainment and communications
become digital. As Sklyarov's case and previous DMCA cases show, the law
now focuses on the mere act of accessing information rather than copying
it. Many people following the issues see the DMCA as the first step toward
a world in which publishing and entertainment companies act as a sort
of Orwellian Big Brother that gets to dictate exactly how consumers can
access any kind of published information and entertainment.
"Basically, the DMCA outlaws [mechanisms that function like] photocopiers
- not when someone uses the photocopier to sell cheap copies of Steven
King novels, but because it could be used to do so - copyright law traditionally
has prosecuted the infringer, not the mechanism of infringement. The DMCA
turns those tables," said C. Scott Ananian, a computer science graduate
student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology involved in the protests.
"Adobe has every right to go after pirates who attempt to profit from
illicit copies of eBooks, but they should go after the pirates, not the
photocopier."
What concerns Ananian is that this law only applies to digital information
and he believes that in five to 10 years all information will be produced
electronically.
"If your kid is doing his book report on an eBook, Dmitry's software
allows him to extract text and pictures and use it - he can make a poster
for class with his favorite pictures and quotes from each charater," said
Ananian, echoing what many legal academics have already noted as problematic
with the DMCA. "With the DMCA, a publisher can design a system that locks
stuff up much tighter than copyright law would normally allow, but for
which there would be a criminal prosecution of anyone who cracks the lock,"
says Jonathan Zittrain, faculty co-director of the Berkman Center for
Internet & Society at Harvard Law School.
At a time in which the digitization of information makes information
more portable and convenient to access in different formats, the DMCA
has the potential to slow down that development by giving publishers an
unprecedented amount of control over how they want to publish information
and what subsequently happens to the information once it's published.
Civil libertarians and legal scholars studying the issues worry that the
effect could inadvertently impede the flow of information in our society.
As an example, Harvard's Zittrain said that libraries' abilities to lend
books could be constrained by electronic book software if books were exclusively
published using specific pieces of ebook software since some versions
only allow readers to access the book on one specific computer. Under
the DMCA, librarians could be jailed for trying to convert those books
to more portable formats so that they could lend the books.
Adobe first informed the FBI about Moscow-based Elcomsoft and its online
distribution of its Advanced eBook Processor in late June. Anti-piracy
investigators at Adobe told the FBI that they were concerned that people
could download the Advanced eBook Processor over the Internet and use
it to unlock Adobe's eBook Reader software in order to copy eBooks without
paying the booksellers, according to an FBI agent's affadavit. "The reason
we alerted the US attorney's office is because of the infringement on
copyright law - our interest is in protecting copyrighted material, that's
the crux of it for us," said an Adobe spokesperson.
The protestors believe that corporations have extended the protections
for intellectual property to the point where it's come at the expense
of making new discoveries, since the DMCA has made it illegal to reverse
engineer an encrypted product without the copyright owner's permission.
This has impeded researchers' abilities to find flaws in existing encryption
systems and fix them. This spring, for example, the Recording Industry
of America threatened to sue Princeton professor Ed Felten if he published
his findings on the digital watermarking system written by the Secure
Digital Music Initiative Consortium.
Protestors reporting from the demonstrations said that most passers-by
were curious about the issue, but hardly anyone knows what the DMCA is.
When a programmer explained the issues to her, 16-year-old Maria Kosovsky,
who was working as a page at the New York Public Library sounded skeptical.
"It sounds to me that [the publishers] are just trying to make money.
It's a capitalist system, people have a right to make money and free books
isn't part of the system," she said.
Protestors around the country and even around the world met online through
an electronic e-mail list last week to organize their demonstrations in
21 cities in the United States and in Moscow. Meanwhile a cottage industry
of propaganda tools to explain and popularize the complex issues involved
in this protracted fight has quickly mushroomed in Cyberspace. Chants,
slogans, flyers, posters and t-shirts have been created and a several
Web sites, including www.boycottadobe.com and www.freedmitry.com are up
and running. After talking with representatives from the Electronic frontier
Foundation Monday Adobe released a joint statement with the EFF calling
for Sklyarov's release.
"We believe that if Adobe says that they would like to withdraw their
complaint, the US attorney's office will consider that very carefully,
and whether to proceed with prosecuting Sklyarov," said Will Doherty,
an EFF spokesman.
Skylarov remained in jail in Las Vegas and is scheduled to be extradited
to San Jose sometime on Tuesday or Wednesday, said Alexander Katalov,
Elcomsoft's president in San Francisco. A statement from the U.S. Attorney's
Office in the Northern District of California said that Sklyarov made
an initial appearance in federal court in Las Vegas last Monday and was
detained without bail. No date had been set for his next appearance but
Katalov said he had retained legal counsel for Sklyarov.

|